IRC National Rankings: 1/18/09

Monday, January 19, 2009

TOP 25 Games This Weekend:

The new rankings have been posted and can be viewed below. There are more than 30 match ups between top 25 teams this week, with the game between #1 Lindenwood and #3 UMSL drawing the most attention. If there are any games that I missed just post it in the comments section or email me and I will include it in this list. Good Luck to everyone playing this weekend.

Friday
#16 Towson vs #21 Stony Brook
#8 Rowan vs #10 Shippensburg

Saturday
#1 Lindenwood vs #20 Missouri
#1 Saddleback vs #12 UNLV
#4 Buffalo vs #9 Rhode Island
#8 Central Florida vs #10 Florida
#11 Eastern Michigan vs #13 Ohio State
#3 Suffolk CC vs #21 Stony Brook
#4 Valencia CC vs #22 Florida International
#1 Lindenwood vs #3 UM-St. Louis
#10 Florida vs #22 Florida International
#11 Eastern Michigan vs #16 Michigan
#7 Rutgers vs #9 Rhode Island
#4 Buffalo vs #21 Stony Brook
#6 Louisiana-Lafayette vs #23 LSU
#6 Louisiana-Lafayette vs #18 North Texas
#20 Albany vs #24 Slippery Rock
#2 St. Charles CC vs #6 Missouri State
#2 West Chester vs #10 Shippensburg
#14 Drexel vs #20 Albany
#2 West Chester vs #21 Millersville

Sunday
#8 Central Florida vs #22 Florida International
#11 Eastern Michigan vs #13 Ohio State
#1 Lindenwood vs #12 SIU, Edwardsville
#3 UM-St. Louis vs #4 Truman State
#8 Central Florida vs #10 Florida
#13 Ohio State vs #16 Michigan
#8 Rowan vs #21 Millersville
#11 Florida Atlantic vs #22 Florida State
#1 Neumann vs #19 Brockport
#2 West Chester vs #20 Albany
#1 Neumann vs #14 Drexel
#6 Missouri State vs #12 SIU, Edwardsville

Division I Rankings - 1/19/08

#1 – Lindenwood University - 2155.41
#2 - Michigan State University - 2034.32
#3 - University of Missouri-St. Louis - 1995.53
#4 - University at Buffalo - 1883.82
#5 – University of California, Irvine - 1876.07
#6 - University of Louisiana at Lafayette - 1872.30
#7 - Rutgers University - 1811.45
#8 - University of Central Florida - 1799.24
#9 - University of Rhode Island - 1768.13
#10 - University of Florida - 1753.23
#11 - Eastern Michigan University - 1727.62
#12 - University of Nevada, Las Vegas - 1725.03
#13 - The Ohio State University - 1722.33
#14 - California State University, Long Beach - 1702.84
#15 - Towson University - 1692.63
#16 - University of Michigan - 1674.20
#17 - Colorado State University - 1674.04
#18 - University of North Texas - 1665.22
#19 - University of California, Santa Barbara - 1644.88
#20 - University of Missouri - 1632.67
#21 - Stony Brook University - 1612.83
#22 - Florida International University - 1604.95
#23 - Louisiana State University - 1595.52
#24 - Arizona State University - 1569.22
#25 - Texas Tech University - 1559.30

Division II Rankings - 1/19/09

#1 – Neumann College - 2080.70
#2 - West Chester University - 1955.73
#3 - University of California, San Diego - 1953.91
#4 - Truman State University - 1725.79
#5 - Elon University - 1715.71
#6 - Missouri State University - 1711.62
#7 - Grand Valley State - 1701.42
#8 - Rowan University - 1698.79
#9 - University of Texas, Dallas - 1642.46
#10 - Shippensburg University - 1632.28
#11 - Florida Atlantic University - 1628.48
#12 - Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville - 1612.89
#13 - Central Michigan University - 1608.94
#14 - Drexel University - 1592.98
#15 - University of Tampa - 1587.20
#16 - Kennesaw State University - 1583.62
#17 - University of Northern Colorado - 1558.15
#18 - University of Colorado - 1556.54
#19 - State University of New York, Brockport - 1554.40
#20 - State University of New York, Albany - 1552.07
#21 - Millersville University - 1549.38
#22 - Florida State University - 1541.34
#23 - Western Carolina University - 1534.65
#24 - Slippery Rock University - 1532.19
#25 - St. Louis University - 1525.55

Junior College Rankings - 1/19/09

#1 – Saddleback College - 1720.90
#2 – St. Charles Community College - 1629.16
#3 - Suffolk County Community College - 1599.60
#4 - Valencia Community College - 1539.78
#5 – Front Range County Community College - 1507.31

B Division Rankings - 1/19/09

#1 - Michigan State University - 1545.99
#2 - University at Buffalo - 1544.14
#3 - West Chester University - 1527.47
#4 - University of California, Santa Barbara Gold - 1511.14
#5 - Lindenwood University Gold - 1509.40
#6 - Colorado State University - 1490.05
#7 - Suffolk County CC Gold - 1473.19
#8 - University of Missouri-St. Louis - 1472.54
#9 - Grand Valley State - 1432.14
#10 - University of Central Florida - 1431.01
#11 - Arizona State University - 1401.78
#12 - Drexel University - 1397.50
#13 - Lindenwood University Black - 1391.57
#14 - Texas Tech University - 1382.75
#15 - Texas A&M University - 1355.90
#16 - Saddleback College - 1353.23
#17 - Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University - 1338.03
#18 - Towson University - 1336.19
#19 - University of Texas, Arlington - 1332.10
#20 - University of California, Santa Barbara Blue - 1302.13

The Rankings Explained

Since the conclusion of the season both founders set out to find the best solution to answer the age old question, “Who’s #1?” After much search, the answer was to use a mathematical formula to calculate the answer. Removing the human element from the voting would likely result in less biased rankings towards individual teams and regions.

The solution would be found in the ELO chess rating system. They system was created to rank chess players by another means that wins, losses and draws. The system uses a mathematical formula to reward each person for impressive feats and punish them for lesser impressive feats. Because chess and inline hockey are two different animals, the general equation had to be changed to allow for more hockeys related factors into the equation.

Using the FIFA Women’s World Rankings as a guideline (Elo Based), we managed to change the rankings to suit the nature of our sport. The rankings include the importance of the game, the outcome of the game, the expected result of the game, and the goal differential of the game when calculating a result. To better explain the way the rankings work I give you the following examples (all team start with a ranking of 1500):

Lindenwood University (1500) vs. UMSL (1500): If Lindenwood won the regular season game 4-3; they would be awarded 15 points for the victory and UMSL would be docked 15 points. However, if the game was won 12-2, Lindenwood would earn 39.38 points for the victory and UMSL would be docked 39.38 points. Additionally, the importance of the game could change, using the national title game as the example, with both teams having equal ratings Lindenwood would be awarded 52.5 points for a 6-3 win.

However, as you could assume, two teams having the same rating would be rare. Each teams point total carries over from one week to the next and from one season to the next. The following is a example of two teams with different point values and the different results it can produce.

Lindenwood University (1746.38) vs. Illinois State (1360.88): There are a few things that you can determine because of the vast difference in each teams rating (385.5). The first is that Lindenwood is expected to win the game. The second is that Illinois State winning the game would be a much bigger accomplishment that Lindenwood winning the game. The maximum points Lindenwood can earn from this game is 7.72, which would mean they won by at least 10 goals. However, on the flip side, if Illinois State was to win the game by at least 10 goals they could earn as many as 71.03 points. This is based on the projection that Lindenwood would win the match-up 90% of the time.

As the two examples show, there are a bunch of positives when using this system. For starters, once a team has achieved a high rating, it becomes difficult for them to increase it without playing a higher level of competition. This rewards regions that have more competitive teams. It also rewards teams who travel out of the region and win games against other higher rated teams. For example, last season, Towson and Army both played James Madison who would have had a higher rating that both visiting teams. In the games, Army and Towson both won handily and would have increased their ratings while negatively hurting James Madison. But, the hidden bonus is they now can bring those rating points back into their region. Those points then become spread out over the entire region as the season progresses and teams win and lose.

For the ratings system to work, each game has to have a certain amount of value attached to it. In the system we will be using five different levels to rate the importance of any give game. The first level is the lowest level of importance; it contains all pre-season exhibition games. The second level includes all regular-season regional games, as well as cross-divisional exhibition games. Level three includes all cross-regional games and invitational based tournaments, like WinterFest. The fourth level includes all regional playoff games and the fifth and final level includes all national playoff games.